Friday, July 31, 2020
Champagne
Wednesday, July 29, 2020
Vaccination No or Yes
I remember another epidemic in the early 1950s. It was polio. Summers were spent mainly at home: no swimming pool, no movies, no even going downtown. Too dangerous as the numbers mounted even though they were a fraction of today's count for COVID-19. I also remember school being postponed.
In the 1952 U.S. epidemic, 3,145 people died. 21,269 were left
with paralysis, most of which were children.
An acquaintance of my mother's ended up in an iron lung (photo above). In 2009, one of the last patients to use one died at 72. She'd spent 60 years in an iron lung.
Dr. Jonas Salk (1914-1995) developed a vaccine.
When asked, "Who owns this patent?," he said "Well, the people I would say. There is no patent. Could you patent the sun?" Had it been patented it would have earned an estimated seven billion dollars.
Polio was eliminated as one of the world's most dangerous infections.
As a child I had chicken pox, mumps, measles and whooping cough as did my brother and most of my classmates. None died. We had already been vaccinated against smallpox as part of the requirement to attend school. I was proud of the scar on my upper right arm. Today, it is invisible.
When I was pregnant with my daughter, I was exposed to German measles, which had I come down with the disease could have led to birth defects. I didn't catch the disease.
During pregnancy I was also given a flu vaccine, caught the flu and nearly died. The other two times I've been given a flu vaccine, I've had the flu and been seriously, seriously ill. The years I didn't get a shot, I didn't get the flu.
The flu mutates so I could have been given the wrong vaccine for the type I had.
I did do the basic vaccines with my daughter. Today there are many more.
I am not saying I don't believe in shots, but I don't trust big pharma.
There is the CEO of one of the big companies who claimed he wasn't in the business of saving lives but making money.
There have been medicine and vaccine failures. Thalidomide is one of the biggest mistakes. It's original use did solve a problem, but only when it was given to pregnant women, was it discovered it caused birth defects.
Diethylstilbestrol (DES) between 1940-1970 relieved potential miscarriage problems. Only in the 1970s did a number of the women's daughters developed cancer of the cervix as well as hormone disruption. Being fair, no vaccine can wait two generations before being used.
America is suffering a opioid crisis from a company that oversold its product.
Hormone replacement therapy was given to almost every postmenopausal woman for years, problems or not, almost a rite of passage. For severe cases, it was helpful. Most others could have been treated nutritional. From personal experience, adding tofu to my diet eliminated problems. Other friends reported the same results. We were a cash cow to big pharma.
Other medicines have been discovered to have adverse side effects after use. Sometimes big pharma has withdrawn the drug immediately -- other times, they have not.
A book, Pharma, by Gerald Posner, goes into far greater detail.Now we are faced with a global pandemic and labs in countries all over the world are racing to find a vaccine. It is needed.
- How safe will it be?
- How good will the quality control be?
- How expensive? I doubt if big pharma will have Salk's attitude.
There is no doubt that pandemic did not have to be as bad as it is. There were ways to slow and stop it. Government officials have not been willing to conduct the necessary steps to stop it.
People have not been willing to follow the steps that would stop it.
I hate to admit a certain pleasure when someone who had opened themselves and others to danger, have come down with the disease. I've never been a fan of stupid, but I feel guilty thinking I told you so and wishing anyone bad. I feel even more guilty when I think how innocent people, those who are doing what is recommended have been made victims of the inconsideration and stupidity of others.
Will I get the vaccination? I can't say one way or another. I'm leaning not to, but it depends on the country and the company.
Monday, July 27, 2020
High School Sack Day and Authority
I went to a local farm store and bought the sack. My
grandmother turned it into a rather cute, but itchy dress.
We arrived at school and were immediately sent home to
change.
We obeyed and most of us were back before lunch.
What a missed opportunity.
Rather than whip us into line, they could have used it as a teaching moment and tell the girls how during the depression burlap sacks were used to make children’s clothing. It was so common that the makers of the sacks often added designs such as flowers to the material.
Or they could have called all the girls into the auditorium and congratulated them on their creativity. They could have had made it a contest on whose sack dress was the most original.
Instead the used the event to increase their authority.
At university when there was a ballot for class officers we were told to check boxes. I put a little flag on the top of my check. The administration made a scene about irresponsibility, following directions and held another vote. I had marked a box. My vote was clear. My reason for doing it was only to bring a smile to those that tallied the votes, a tiresome process at best.
Only later, bit by bit as I made my way up the career ladder did I realized that authority erases originality for control.
In some companies where I worked, ideas from the lower
echelon were often ignored. Many would have made improvements but employees
learned to conform and good ideas did not help the company.
In 1970 we had to beg our boss to be allowed to wear pantsuits, which he considered unladylike. It was not a company where clients ever stepped across our threshold. We only saw each other. All writers were women. Only the boss and the printer were male.
Digital in the 1980s had an experiment with “troublemakers”
putting them in one manufacturing plant. Instead of the usual hierarchy there
was one manager who was more of a liaison. Every employee was responsible for
everything. Who did what was by agreement and usually those who could do things
best found the slot that matched their abilities. Also, if a person had the
sign-off responsibility of a computer that went wrong, it was his or her job to
go to the client to solve the problem. Some were even showing up weekends to tend the landscaping on their own time. People were so involved that the company
had to hire an anthropologist to make sure people took the correct time off.
It also reinforced with the freedom came responsibility.
The plant was one of the best in production.
Societies need agreement, another word for conformity,
but conformity can reach a point that stifles progress. Only by breaking
accepted standards of society for example, did women get the vote and although
civil rights have improved for blacks and browns, conformity and acceptance of
the conformity have not given them equal status to whites and not just as in
the U.S.
A people pushed to what they consider their limits
will rebel.
Ask Marie Antoinette.
Ask King George about the Minutemen.
Those in authority do not want the challenges. If everyone marches along as robots, doing and thinking what they are told, there is a certain peace—especially for those at the top who benefit from that obedience.
And there can be a certain comfort (that word again) knowing your place in your society.
When Czechoslovakia rebelled against Russia, a news broadcast reported that parents told their children, “We tried it, it didn’t work.”
The children replied, “But we didn’t try.” It worked.
All of us are surrounded by the norms of where we live. Many of those norms work and there is an unquestioning acceptance of those norms. What woman in 1850 would think it was anything but normal that she be considered her husband’s property?
What about the artist who only painted realistic paintings?
What about the musician that only played the classics?
About the women who once could only be secretaries, nurses and teachers?
On a personal level there does need to be some standards to prevent chaos. Determining the level of comfort with those standards can be difficult. Being the first one to push the boundaries of those standards, can be costly to the individual including rejection from the authority setting those standards. Asking why, what else, what about the other side can shake our comfort zone. It depends on the answer that governs the reaction between acceptance and revolt.
Saturday, July 25, 2020
A Birthday Colonoscopy
This is a Dueling Blog. To read Rick's perspective: http://lovinglifeineurope.blogspot.com/ |