Sunday, June 28, 2026

Coat Hangers and Knitting Needles - Fertility fights

In researching the book Coat Hangers and Knitting Needles, two of the most depressing things were the fight to keep birth control away from women. The second was the individual women's stories. Even when I was engaged my doctor told me to come back for a diaphragm after I was married.

Fertility Fights

 What frustrated Sanger was how many women she met had tried self-induced abortions. Most had been told when they asked their doctors how to prevent pregnancy—abstinence. 

When Margaret Sanger became active in fighting for women to have access to birth control, she was often ignored. The message that too many children could destroy a family because of inadequate resources took years to reach lawmaker’s ears.

Margaret Higgins Sanger (1879-1966) made the term “birth control” popular. Much of her early adult life was spent crusading for women to have access to birth control. To do it, she had to break the law.

Sanger was born Margaret Louise Higgins in Corning, New York. Her father, Michael H. Higgins, was an Irish immigrant who left the Catholic church. Although he wanted to be a doctor, he ended up working as a stonemason.

Her mother, Anne, emigrated from Ireland during the potato famine. The couple had 11 children and seven unsuccessful births. Anne died at 49.

How being a child from such a large family shaped Sanger’s attitudes about birth control is conjecture.

Her older sisters helped Sanger go to Claverack College and Hudson River Institute. She started nurses training at White Plains Hospital.

She married William Sanger in 1902. They had three children.

After a fire destroyed the Sanger couple’s home in Hastings-on Hudson, the family moved to New York City.

The marriage ended in 1921. Although she remarried, she continued her work under the Sanger name.

Not Preventing Pregnancy Led to Abortions

Sanger worked in the slums as a visiting nurse. Her husband was an architect. Both were social activists. What frustrated Sanger was how many women she met had tried self-induced abortions. Most had been told when they asked their doctors how to prevent pregnancy—abstinence.

The advice was unrealistic and unsatisfactory.

Sanger considered women controlling their own fertility mandatory. Her method of activism to promote her belief that contraception and empowerment were linked was through the written word.

She created pamphlets, which could not legally be distributed through the mail because of the Comstock Laws. Instead she used family-planning and birth control clinics such as Harlem Birth Control, which she founded, boosting distribution to several hundred thousand copies.

The clinic had all-female doctors and a 100% African-American advisory council. Later, African-Americans were added to the staff.

She created a monthly newsletter, The Woman Rebel. Its slogan was “No Gods, No Masters,” borrowed from the Industrial Workers of the World who used it in the 1912 Lawrence Textile Strike. Sanger’s pamphlets with detailed descriptions of contraception methods challenged the Comstock Laws.

The Postal Service suppressed seven of 11 issues of her newsletter. Sanger was arrested. She escaped to the U.K. in 1914. While there, she came under the influence of Havelock Ellis, who believed sex should be safe and pleasurable for women.

Sanger wrote two articles for New York Call that would produce some outrage for their frankness:   

  • “What Every Mother Should Know”       
  •  “What Every Girl Should Know”
  •  They were published in book format in 1916. A1917 edition also had information on:  
  •  Cervical caps  
  •  Diaphragms 
  • Douches

Her book, Family Limitation, caused her to be prosecuted again under the Comstock Laws. It is still available in a 2017 edition. On Amazon, many of the reader reviews show a lack of understanding of the danger that this advice, the best available at the time, brought her.

It is hard to believe today that something like distributing birth control information would lead to 30 days in a workhouse and include force-feeding. That happened to Sanger’s sister and fellow birth-control advocate Ethel Byrne. Even more disturbing, at Sanger’s trial the judge said that women did not have the right to “to copulate with a feeling of security that there will be no resulting conception.”

Sanger would be arrested eight times.

She refused to promise she would not break the law again. A victory of sorts happened when Judge Frederick E. Crane ruled in the New York Court of Appeals that doctors could provide contraception information. The catch was that they should only prescribe birth control for reasons of health.

In 1917 Sanger began publishing the Birth Control Review, which was designed to promote support to the medical and legislative communities as well as the middle and upper classes. It encouraged readers to join the American Birth Control League (she founded ABCL in 1921), which later became Planned Parenthood. Publication stopped in 1929. The themes were:

  • Children should be conceived in love
  • Children should be born of their mother’s conscious desire
  • Children should be created only under conditions which make possible the heritage of health

Sanger had the financial support of John D. Rockefeller Jr. for her ABCL.

Her work was not limited to the U.S. She discovered that the method of family planning in Asia was infanticide, most often of a female baby. She worked with writer and 1938 Nobel Prize for Literature winner and fighter for women’s rights Pearl Buck to open a family planning clinic in Shanghai.

Sanger had internal political problems with one group. Recently, her belief in eugenics sparked criticism that surfaced again in the 2016 Hillary Clinton campaign for U.S. president.

Sanger divided society into three groups:

  1.  The educated and informed, who limited family size
  2.  The intelligent and responsible, who wanted to control family size despite lacking some of the resources
  3.   Irresponsible and reckless people with “religious scruples” She felt that the third group should be stopped from reproducing.       

Her National Committee on Federal Legislation for Birth Control, a lobbying group to overturn restrictions on contraception, began in 1929.

Frustrated by lack of results, she ordered a diaphragm in 1931 by mail, which was confiscated.

Finally, in 1936, a court decision overturned part of the Comstock Laws. Doctors could order contraception products.

A greater victory came in 1937. The American Medical Association decided contraception was a medical service and was added to the curriculum of many medical schools.

She was nominated for but did not win the Nobel Peace Prize.

Sanger died at age 86 from congestive heart failure, but she lived to see the Griswold v. Connecticut Supreme Court decision legalizing birth control for married women.

Today birth control in many forms is considered normal. Many people today cannot imagine that not only was birth control once considered immoral it could result in prison much as abortion today in some places.

Climate Change is REAL

 


Canicule, French for heat wave. A pretty word to hear. It just slides off your tongue.

The reality of a canicule isn't pretty. Some 30,000 people died from the 2003 canicule some 14,000 in France alone.

Admittedly in Europe, air conditioning isn't as common as it is in the U.S. where it is often kept at pneumonia-producing highs. But that's not the point.

In most of my Swiss and/or French summers, I could keep my home comfortable. I'd let in the cool morning breeze early. When the sun started to rise, close the window, shutters and drapes until afternoon or early evening when again the air was comfortable. Usually in July a fan helped.

In 2003 fans no longer worked as temperatures soared. I was still working corporate then. We had no air conditioning. Executives closed my organization at 3 pm (15:00). Large bottles of water were distributed to everyone.

Although it was only a 10 minute walk home through the alphabet UN  agencies, the few minutes on a sweltering bus was better.

The 2003 winter when I went to the U.S. for Christmas, I wanted to key every SUV and gas guzzling vehicle I saw. When George W. Bush said that America would lose money by fighting climate change, and he didn't want that, I resisted kicking in the television. To people calling climate change a hoax I wanted to roast them.  

Canicules have been shorter but still there since 2003. 

Every trip from the south of France to Geneva or vice versa we notice more solar panels covering fields and parking lots. Charging stations increase at all the rest stops for electric cars. Even signs announcing the electric changing stations are all along the autoroutes next to those telling of gas, toilets, play areas, restaurants at the next stop. 

Some countries are running a good part of their electrical grid on renewables. Regulations are calling for savings. More and more wind turbines dance their dance. 

Trump's attitude toward climate change is to not just deny it but to make matters worse cutting regulations and supporting fossil fuels.

Europe, from Spain to Scandinavia, are trapped within a heat dome. Even the U.K. is caught. 

People are dying. 

Animals are dying. 

Businesses are losing customers. Canicules are not good business.

No hope in sight for the next ten days. More all time heat records have been or will be broken.

Climate change is real. 

How stupid or how greedy are people that they don't see that they can destroy our species, or maybe we deserve it if we continue to mark progress with possessions that consume, consume, consume until we consume ourselves.

George Carlin said that we shouldn't be saying "save the planet. We should be saying save ourselves." 


 


Saturday, June 27, 2026

AI Fiction Writing -- Not good/good Sometimes

 


If you go to see Swan Lake, which would you rather see? Real ballerinas or robots dancing?

Would you rather read a book written by a human or AI?  

I'm in the middle of writing a novella, The Ring. Two middle-aged sisters fight over their late mother's ring. I will serialize it on this blog when done. 

Because as a reader I loved illustrations like Rita Mae Brown and Alexander McCall Smith have done with some of their books before AI. I've wanted to illustrate my work. 

I'm not anti-AI. 

The artwork in this blog is AI generated. It's creatively fun to illustrate my writing. I would never use art AI in place of using a real artist.

When I published my anthology,  The Corporate Virgin  www.barnesandnoble.com/w/the-corporate-virgin-d-l-nelson/1149289313, I illustrated each story with an AI illustration.  

I'm not pro AI either. It depends how it is used. 

I'm anti AI fiction writing.

When I write, or should I say rewrite. there is much polishing done from the rough first draft, which is almost a free write to when I consider the work finished. Some of the steps...

  • Write X number of pages then go over it all. 
  • First polish. Rework the first draft
  • Write some chapters or pages 
  • Change or cut the placement of paragraphs if necessary
  • Change words for stronger words
  • Change ing verbs if stronger verbs come to mind
  • Examine details. DO I need another, or do I have too many? What will make each paragraph more visual?
  • Check details such as spelling of place names, years, whatever to make sure of accuracy 
  • Illuminate ly words 
  • Try and catch typos
  • Repeat above as many times that is necessary. It could be anywhere from 2x to 10+X
  • Reread, rework, reread, rework until it is ready to release.  

I can't believe AI writing  polishes and weighs words, sentences, paragraphs.

  • At the University of Maryland and Google DeepMindIn introduced Story Scope: AI written stories compared against human-written stories for:
  • Structures 
  • Story progress 
  • Tension 
  • Conflict
Some 60,000 stories of around 5000 words were examined.

The results? 

93% the human written story was identified against the AI one.

Is it good news that the AI failed in the same way bad or novice writers fail? AI had
  • Over explanation 
  • Less flashbacks 
  • Less time jumps
  • Too many metaphors
  • Less originality in explaining human emotion
  • Less subplots
  • Less scenes
  • Less dialogue
  • Overly didactic 
  • Not good at comedy 

 There were other comparisons. 

  1. AI over-explains its themes instead of letting readers figure it out.
  2. Human writing is less linear (more time-jumps and flashbacks).
  3. AI relies on bodily metaphors to explain emotion (81% vs. 38% human).
  4. Humans reference specific texts, brands, places (nearly 2x the AI rate).
  5. AI narrative is less diverse (fewer subplots and scenes, less dialogue). 
This blog only discusses fiction writing, not what happens to students who use AI to not do the research and intellectual work of a class assignment. 
 
As readers, my husband and I often start or the day by reading in bed. We interrupt each other to share an especially clever phrase or description. 
 
I know how hard we work to get exactly the right word, the right balance. Sure AI could probably do it faster but I want to share those words with not only my husband or the real live human who poured a bit of his/her heart and soul into creating them for me. 

Notes 

Cory Doctorow  Enshittification: Why Everything Suddenly Got Worse and What to Do About It.


Thursday, June 25, 2026

Surviving the heatwave

I'm surviving the canicule blanketing Europe by going in my imagination to Edinburgh, my second favorite city, from my southern France hidey hole. Edinburgh is my second favorite city in the world.

I'm helped in my mental travels by recent videos of the Scottish in Boston, my first favorite city. These kilt-wearing, bag-pipe playing men were there for the World Cup. There was even a couple of frames of Irn Bru in one shot.

I'm transported even better to Edinburgh by Robin Pilcher's novel Starburst, set during the Edinburgh Fringe. I can see myself walking down the streets I know that she has mentioned.

In the 80s, I became enraptured by professional storytelling in Boston when, along with a Wiggleworth Street neighbor, an elderly anthropologist, we saw a young group of actors tell stories on stage. The first story one the actor played Kermit the Frog moaning he had to go through life with a hand up his butt. 

Not only am I in Edinburgh mentally now, I'm reminded of the Edinburgh Story festival. I ran into it by accident. My husband was in Scotland to play a hickory golf tournament and we couldn't not stop in Edinburgh and discovered the festival. 

Look at past programmes. I would have loved to see all of them.

Most events were held at the John Knox center, that nasty, religious bigot who made Mary Queen of Scots' life difficult. His old home is also a museum. 


On previous trips we did the writer's tour, writer's museum, other museums, stood where Mary Queen of Scots saw her alleged lover David Rizzio murdered, listened to countless bagpipes, met the prototype for Ian Rankin's Rebus, eaten mac and cheese, scoffed scones with copious cups of tea, walked the Royal Mile, and many side streets, did badly in a pub quiz admired adverts for pantomimes and much, much more more. 

I'm happy that I was able to do the story festival at all rather than mourn that I can't go to every story during a whole festival. Concentrating on the positive rather than think of the negative helps keep me cool as I mentally hop the Edinburgh bus and take my seat ready to hear the next story.

Wednesday, June 24, 2026

Where the Free Writes Flow

 Free writes can be written anywhere from the kitchen table to a luxury restaurant, a park bench or a sandy beach.

One of Rick's and D-L's favorite places to Free Write when they are in France is L'Hostalet. In Geneva, when joined by Julia in person for a Free Write, there are local cafés although a couple of times, they've been at one or the other's homes.

Free Writes can be done by one or many responding to a prompt generated by others or the free writer him/herself. 

 Rick and I are about to head to Geneva so this was the last chance we had to sit Free Write at L'Hostalet. We're sharing the ambiance which we will miss until return in the autumn.


Tables are under the mulberry tree. The café faces out on a square and is surrounded by several hundred-year-old plus houses of different colors. No matter how hot, if there is a breeze anywhere in the village it comes here. 

The old mairie (town hall) has been converted into a music school and sometimes we can hear the students practicing with various degrees of success. On the corner, is a sign in French, Catalan and English telling the village's history. The small square commemorates the brave women of the village who stood their ground against the Vichy in WWII.

The square is also used for concerts, programs and Saturday night street dances.   

We don't usually bring our dog to the Free Writes, but we will at other times. Sherlock when he hears "boys" and "go" he is at the door. To him, waiting for the hotel's cats to go in and out of the cat flap is entertainment better than any television show. That's Misty in the photo. Melinda, a black and white cat, loves to walk just out of range of Sherlock's leash, giving him the cat equivalent of the finger.


 Then with our tea, coffee or hot chocolate drunk we are ready to write. The timer in the photo above is for tea, one, two or three minutes. We time the writing with a watch. When we are with Julia in Geneva she has a timer for the writing itself.

 We've done this well over 100 times, considering the Free Write almost sacred. Although we can be flexible on where or when, we still try for 10 a.m. on Tuesdays.

Writers don't need to go to France or Switzerland to Free Write, but I recommend finding a spot or spots where to feel comfortable. It isn't important whether Free Writes are in a beautiful notebook with a special pen or on the back of a letter with a chewed off pencil. What is important is that it's used as a method to stimulate creativity.

We publish our examples on this blog because we want to. We find it interesting to look at our different or not different approaches to the same prompt. We have other writers. using our prompts. They want to remain anonymous. 

I personally find not only is Free Writing a stimulant to my other writing, but a positive balance to all the horrendous things going on the planet.