Another essay found.
“Five continents?
There are seven,” my best friend of thirty years said. We were sitting in her Boston bedroom. Although
I’ve lived in Europe for over a dozen years,
we’ve been able to maintain a close friendship. Nevertheless, from time to time
we bump heads on our different experiences and our different chosen cultures,
each of us digging into stances that waste both our times and energies.
Oops, here’s another landmine, I thought. Still, I went on. “In Europe they teach five,” I said.
She looked at me. “Name them.”
“Er, the Americas, Eurasia...”
My assurance vaporized with the steam of the tea we were drinking. How did
others classify the continents? I had no idea.
“In Germany they teach five,” my
daughter said. She’d done most of her university degree in Mannheim and a 13th year of high school in Munich.
“That’s only one country’s point of
view,” my friend snapped.
Before taking too strong a stance, I
decided to take a survey by emailing my friends, colleagues and neighbors back
in Geneva. One
of the advantages of working for a small international organization with
coworkers representing 47 different nationalities is that it is easy to check
out different perspectives.
The next morning I ran to my email to see if anyone
had answered. My inbox was full.
“Goooooooodmoooooooorningamerriiiiikkaaaa,”
my Romanian colleague wrote. “Europe, Asia, South America, North America, Australia. The others are ice
thingies.”
Okay, I thought. I was wrong about
the Americas
being grouped as a single continent. I then opened the email from my Ukrainian
coworker. “Six,” he said. He grouped North and South
America as one, but added one of my Romanian friend’s “ice
thingies,” Antarctica.
When I was first living
in Europe, he had taught me to look beyond my
beliefs. An ardent Democrat, I resisted going for his jugular when he claimed
that “Reagan was one of America’s
greatest presidents.” Only after he explained, that he felt that it was
Reagan’s Star Wars that helped break up the Soviet Union
giving sovereignty to his country, did I look at that particular president from
my co-worker’s point of view. The ability to see the other side, I still
haven’t mastered, but am closer, thanks to him.
“Five,” my Syrian neighbor, who
works for the World Council of Churches, wrote. “Of course,” she added, “with
all the new countries what I learned in geography has changed. What about
subcontinents like India?”
I’d never thought of India
being a subcontinent and I didn’t want to get into it either.
“FIVE,” was the opinion of my Swiss
German colleague. The” naturally” was implied by the capital letters.
My Swiss-French colleague, who is the secretary to our secretary
general, showed her normal political acumen that our boss so appreciates. “I
learned five,” and then she cited the source. However, detail person that she
is, she checked another source that claimed seven.
My Brit buddy, a person with a
degree in psychology, came up with her usual response. “You need to define your
terms. Is a continent an unbroken landmass…?” Then with her usual sense of
humor she added, “We got rid of your continent and all those gum chewers
centuries ago.” She never named a number.
Suddenly, I saw the silliness in the
situation. Puny mankind could count and define these land masses as they want.
It changes nothing. I then imagined how we who live for only a few decades, try
to control by naming and counting what has existed for millions and millions of
years. I pictured two Alps talking. “What’s
your name now?” one mountain would ask the Matterhorn.
“Some call me the Matterhorn,
some Zermatt, among other things, ” the Alp
would reply.
I closed my email. My friend and I
are meeting my daughter for lunch, three friends, despite differences in age,
chosen life styles, professions, or belief in number of continents. We will
order good food, share memories, plan the upcoming holiday, which is why I am
in the States. The rest is detail, unimportant in our lives.
No comments:
Post a Comment